Apple's first response to the trademark disputes Proview said Apple's statement kept misleading

iPad trademark dispute getting worse, has always been low-key Apple to break past the silence, in that case issued a brief statement, accusing the Proview refused to honor the agreement, saying that Hong Kong courts have supported Apple. The Proview responded said the fight in the end.
Apple: The Hong Kong Court of Justice to support
Troubles for many years iPad trademark rights litigation has been set in the first court of the Guangdong High Court hearing on the 29th of this month. In the case of advancing the process, Shenzhen Proview frequently to the media disclose the progress of the lawsuit blames Apple for infringement of its rights and interests, and in the media. Apple has been silent, and allowed by the pressure of public opinion during this period.
However, Apple suddenly breaking the silence in the evening of February 14. Said in a statement, "Many years ago, we purchased a Proview iPad trademark in different countries of the world's ten. Proview refused to recognize and fulfill the agreement involving the Chinese part of the courts of Hong Kong has supported Apple in mainland China litigation is still ongoing. "Apple this brief statement, Apple did not disclose more details of the courts of Hong Kong for its support, but also did not mention the issue of reconciliation.
On the above issues, the New Express reporter yesterday Contact Apple aspects Solicitor Hao Yang, but to disclose the case refused to be interviewed on the grounds. Only as of press time, Apple PR has yet to interview outline of the reporter to respond.
Proview: Apple's statement is misleading
Apple's statement, Shenzhen Proview attorney Xiexiang Hui yesterday told reporters that "Apple's statement is one-sided, misleading, its purpose is to reverse the negative pressure of public opinion for recently for Apple."
Xie Xianghui statement Proview refuse to recognize and fulfill the Chinese part of the agreement "refers to a dispute between Apple and Proview Taipei, and Shenzhen Proview no. "And unified statement to the general title of 'Proview' misleading suspect."
In addition, according to Xie Xianghui introduced, Apple does in Hong Kong in April 2010, Proview prosecution, but this case has not been a formal hearing, both sides are still in the process of exchange of evidence, the evidence exchange process will continue until March of this year. "In addition, the core of the lawsuit, Apple requires the court imposed a ban on the Shenzhen Proview transfer or sale of the iPad trademark during the proceedings." Xiexiang Hui also said that, although the laws of Hong Kong and the Mainland laws are different, but with the Proview communication on behalf of the lawyer in Hong Kong believe that Hong Kong litigation is still the only the highest winning percentage higher.
Affect
Both sides peace talks and the possibility of decreased
In fact, although the Shenzhen Proview earlier across the country sued Apple, but in communication with the media has been on hold with Apple reconciliation to expect. Now the possibility of realizing this desire will probably be as Apple issued a statement, declined significantly.
Li Su, Shenzhen Proview debt restructuring consultant, said in an interview, Apple said in a statement that Apple did not the sincerity of the negotiations since, Shenzhen Proview fight the in the end, Apple has no chance of winning. He said the the Proview biggest goal is to prohibit Apple from using the iPad trademark. "Even if Apple give up on the mainland using the iPad trademark, we may require to recover compensation."
It is reported that Apple and Shenzhen Proview iPad trademark dispute will be extended to a global scale, Shenzhen Proview has been in the United States to find lawyers intend to be prosecuted in the United States on the Apple.
Cases of fermentation
Multi-appliance business off the shelf Apple iPad
Following previously iPad Shijiazhuang, Trade and Industry Bureau for further inquiries, recently also rumors that the Jingdong Mall, Suning Tesco, Amazon and China, the shelf iPad product.
Reporters yesterday on the Amazon websites in China to enter the Apple iPad Tablet PC could not find the related products. Amazon China responsible person in an interview with the media, said the moratorium on the sale of i-Pad2 is due to Apple's own notification requirements under the frame of this product.
In addition, Jingdong Mall on February 14, once the shelf iPad2 iPad2 sales of yesterday morning, but yesterday afternoon, Jingdong Mall again full shelf iPad2. Search Jingdong Mall and the search bar before and after reporters yesterday, 15:00 iPad2, results showed that the the iPad2 all products are no specific offer; 6:00 in the evening, when reporters try to search again, the search results only remaining peripheral products no longer iPad2 product information .
Strangely enough, however, is previously known to have been "off the shelf" iPad products Suning Tesco, yesterday afternoon, back on the shelves iPad product. Claimed its discretion, require the shelves the iPad2 of Apple, nor on its website under the i-Pad2 products.
Trouble
Apple and the Andrews camp patent battle played inextricably
IPad trademark infringement case between Apple and Shenzhen Proview has been heating up, but because of Apple and the Andrews camp patent war is played inextricably Andrews camp, Motorola and Samsung, two companies did not let go of the apple "adding insult to injury the opportunity, Apple also had so distracted.
January 25 this year, Motorola filed a lawsuit to the United States District Court of Southern District of Florida, accusing Apple released in October last year iPhone4S infringement of six patents related to its mobile technology. Motorola also accused Apple released last year, the iCloud content storage service infringed its patents.
Apple and Samsung Electronics patent disputes also continue to ferment. February 14, Apple has applied for by the California court issued a preliminary injunction to prohibit the sale of Samsung Galaxy Nexus smartphone on the grounds that the device infringed Apple's four patents.
It is understood that, Apple sued Samsung or the Samsung sued Apple has more than 30 cases. Both sides of the patent dispute began in April last year, when Apple first indictments in San Jose, sued Samsung Galaxy series copied from Apple's iPhone and iPad series.
Some analysts believe that the European Commission and U.S. Department of Justice has approved Google's $ 12.5 billion acquisition of Motorola's mobile transactions, and confirm the Google Android operating system after the completion of the acquisition, will continue to promote fair and authorized Motorola related patents. Therefore, in the competition of the two camps, Apple may be caught in an unfavorable situation.
Stock markets rule the roost
Apple's stock price breaking the $ 500 ultra-iPad2 Price
Currently, Apple have to pay huge compensation costs? The iPad is forced to change their names? Everything depends on the final results. But for Apple, the lock-up storm in China is like a small episode, did not affect the strong performance of its global growth momentum.
February 14, Apple's stock price continued the previously rising trend all day up 1.36 percent, to close at $ 509.46, firm above $ 500, its market capitalization of $ 473.588 billion. At present, Apple's stock price more than $ 500 per share, more than the $ 499 price of the Apple's official online iPad2.
In fact, Apple this rising trend is not only recently, Apple's stock price over the past three years has maintained this sustained growth. The current stock price distance to exceed $ 400 for the first time just the past six months, and exceeded $ 300 only after 16 months, exceed $ 200 in October 2009, three years ago, the share price of about $ 78.2.
It is worth mentioning that, despite Apple's stock price continues to rise, but still can not reflect the increase of profit. Apple's stock price rose 40 percent in the past year, the company's profits since the 2011 one-quarter increase of 117%. In the past two years, although the share price increased by 150 percent, profits there is an increase of 286%. In the past three years, the stock rose 539 percent profit growth of 711%.